Pull Request Metrics
Essential analytics for understanding and optimizing your team's code review workflow.
Definition
Pull Request Metrics are quantitative measurements that track the efficiency and quality of your code review process. They include PR size, review timing, merge rates, and rework patterns—providing visibility into bottlenecks that slow down software delivery.
Key Pull Request Metrics
PR Size
Lines of code changed (additions + deletions)
Smaller PRs get faster, higher-quality reviews
Time to First Review
Time from PR opened to first review comment
Fast initial feedback keeps developers unblocked
Review Cycle Time
Time from PR opened to approved
Long review cycles slow deployment frequency
Merge Rate
Percentage of PRs that get merged vs closed
Low merge rates indicate wasted effort or unclear requirements
Rework Rate
PRs requiring changes after initial review
High rework indicates quality issues or misalignment
Review Depth
Comments per PR and reviewers per PR
Balanced review depth catches issues without slowing delivery
Why PR Size Matters Most
Research from SmartBear and Microsoft shows a strong correlation between PR size and defect rates. Smaller PRs receive more thorough reviews and catch more issues before they reach production.
Why PR Metrics Matter
Pull requests are the heartbeat of modern software development. Every feature, bug fix, and improvement flows through PRs:
- Velocity indicator: PR throughput directly correlates with delivery speed
- Quality gate: Review metrics predict code quality and defect rates
- Collaboration health: Review patterns reveal team dynamics and knowledge sharing
- Bottleneck detector: Long review times expose process and capacity issues
Common PR Workflow Problems
Review Bottlenecks
- • Single-reviewer dependencies
- • PRs waiting days for review
- • Timezone mismatches
- • Unclear reviewer assignment
Size Problems
- • Monster PRs (1000+ lines)
- • Multiple features per PR
- • Refactoring mixed with features
- • "Just one more thing" commits
Best Practices for PR Metrics
- Set PR size limits: Configure linters to warn on large PRs (> 400 lines)
- Establish review SLAs: First review within 4 hours, approval within 24 hours
- Use PR templates: Standardize descriptions, test plans, and screenshots
- Automate where possible: CI/CD checks, auto-assign reviewers, auto-merge
- Track trends: Monitor metrics weekly, not per-PR
- Celebrate improvements: Recognize teams that improve their metrics
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the most important pull request metrics?
The most important PR metrics are: PR Size (lines changed), Time to First Review, Review Cycle Time, Merge Rate, and Rework Rate. Together, these metrics reveal bottlenecks in your code review process.
What is a good PR size?
Research shows PRs under 200 lines of code have the highest review quality and fastest merge times. PRs over 400 lines have significantly higher defect rates and review times. Aim for small, focused PRs.
How long should code review take?
Best-in-class teams achieve first review within 4 hours and complete review cycles within 24 hours. If PRs regularly wait more than a day for review, it indicates a bottleneck that should be addressed.
What is PR throughput?
PR throughput measures how many pull requests a team merges per time period (usually per week). It indicates development velocity but should be balanced against PR quality metrics.
How do you reduce PR review time?
Key strategies include: smaller PRs, clear PR descriptions, automated testing, designated reviewers, review SLAs, async-first review culture, and using PR templates to standardize information.
Track Your PR Metrics Automatically
DevSpy analyzes pull requests across GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket to surface PR size, review time, and merge patterns.
Start Free Trial→